Primary source brief

The Powell Memo

In August 1971, a corporate lawyer sent a private memo to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. He wrote that American business was losing public support. He then gave a detailed plan to recover it. Two months later, the President nominated him to the Supreme Court.

The outline

The document A confidential memo of approximately 6,400 words, titled Attack on American Free Enterprise System.
Title
Attack on American Free Enterprise System
Author
Lewis F. Powell, Jr., a corporate lawyer in Richmond, Virginia
Date
23 August 1971
Sent to
Eugene B. Sydnor, Jr., chair of the Education Committee, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Status
Confidential. The press published it in September 1972.
Length
Approximately 6,400 words

The memo is a private plan for action. Powell wrote it for Eugene Sydnor, a friend who directed the education work of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber had asked Powell what business must do about its loss of public support.

Powell was not a politician. He was a senior partner in a law firm in Richmond, Virginia. He was also a past president of the American Bar Association, a Democrat, and a director of several corporations. One of these corporations was Philip Morris.

The memo has two parts. The first part says that the free enterprise system is under attack. The second part gives the plan, area by area.

The attack Business believed that it faced one connected attack, in four parts: the law, the economy, the critics, and the young.

Powell wrote that a small extreme group was not the source of the attack. The attack came from the universities, the churches, the media, the intellectual journals, and the politicians. Respectable people made it. That fact, Powell wrote, made the attack dangerous.

The most disquieting voices ... come from perfectly respectable elements of society. Lewis F. Powell, Jr., 23 August 1971

The law

Between 1969 and 1971, the government created the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. It also passed the National Environmental Policy Act and made the Clean Air Act much stronger. A Republican president signed these measures. Each one gave a federal agency direct control over how a company operates. Business had seen no change of this speed since the 1930s.

The economy

Profits were under pressure, foreign competition was increasing, and inflation was high. On 15 August 1971, the President froze all wages and prices for ninety days. This was eight days before Powell wrote the memo. It was the first control of prices in American history outside a war. To business, it showed that even a friendly government would set the terms.

The critics

Powell named four men. Ralph Nader had made the safety of products a national issue. Powell called him the single most effective antagonist of American business. Charles Reich of Yale attacked the whole system in his book The Greening of America.

Herbert Marcuse taught a Marxist analysis of the system. William Kunstler defended the people who broke the law against it. To business, these were not marginal figures. They had large audiences and respectful coverage in the press.

The young

Powell cited a survey of students. Almost half of them supported public ownership of the basic industries. The universities trained the next managers, lawyers, journalists, and officials. Business concluded that it was losing the next generation. It was losing that generation inside institutions that business itself helped to fund.

One attack, not four

Business did not read these as four separate complaints. It read them as one connected attack on the system itself. Whether that reading was correct is a different question. It is what business believed in 1971. It is the belief that the memo acted on.

The response Business had money and organizational skill. It used almost none of it on the public argument.

Business had no answer to the attack. Powell wrote that business made concessions, kept silent, and left the public argument to other people.

Powell's main practical point was about scale and time. One company alone could not change public opinion. Only national organizations could do it. They must act together, receive steady funds, and continue for many years.

Business had money and organizational skill. Powell wrote that it used almost none of these resources on the public argument.

The plan Nine areas of work, coordinated by the Chamber, funded steadily, and continued for many years.

Powell listed the areas of work and the method for each area. In his plan, the Chamber controls and coordinates the whole effort.

The campus

Employ a staff of scholars who defend the system. Ask the universities and their trustees for balance in the social science departments. Pay for speakers, and get them a place on the campus as a right.

Textbooks

Form panels of scholars. The panels examine the social science textbooks for bias. Civil rights groups and labor unions already used this method.

Schools

Use the same plan in the secondary schools. The national Chamber sets the standard. The local chambers do the work.

Media

Monitor the television networks and the news programs continuously. If a program is unfair, make a complaint to the network and to the FCC. Demand equal time.

Publishing

Get the scholars who support business to write continuously, in academic journals, in popular magazines, and in books. Their output must equal the output of the other side.

Advertising

Spend part of the corporate advertising budget on the free enterprise system, and not on products. Powell suggested a minimum of ten percent.

Politics

Business must not be cautious about political power. It must use that power, support the politicians who agree with it, and penalize the politicians who do not.

The courts

Employ the best available lawyers. Use the courts as a planned method, with amicus briefs and selected cases. The ACLU and the labor unions already used this method. Powell wrote that the courts are possibly the most important instrument for social and economic change.

Stockholders

Organize the twenty million American stockholders into a political group. Use the company's own communications to reach them.

How it got out A columnist published it in September 1972, eight months after Powell took his seat on the Supreme Court.

Powell sent the memo on 23 August 1971. On 21 October, President Nixon nominated him to the Supreme Court. In December, the Senate confirmed him by 89 votes to 1. He took his seat in January 1972. Nobody disclosed the memo during the confirmation.

The columnist Jack Anderson then obtained a copy. He wrote about it on 28 and 29 September 1972. Powell had been a justice for eight months. Anderson wrote that a serving justice had made a plan for corporate America. The story did not continue. The public then forgot the memo for approximately thirty years.

What followed Registered lobbyists in Washington rose from 175 firms in 1971 to nearly 2,500 in 1982.

Firms with registered lobbyists in Washington

1971 and 1982

Firms with registered lobbyists in Washington, 1971 and 1982 In 1971, 175 firms had registered lobbyists. In 1982, nearly 2,500 did. 2,000 1,000 0 175 ≈2,500 1971 1982
The count rose from 175 firms to nearly 2,500 in eleven years, approximately fourteen times as many. These are two counts, not an annual series. No year-by-year count exists for this period. Registration under the lobbying act of 1946 was loose, and many organizations did not register at all. Both counts are therefore too low. The change between them is the reliable part. Source: Hacker and Pierson, Winner-Take-All Politics.

Total reported federal lobbying spending

1998 to 2024, nominal dollars

Total reported federal lobbying spending, 1998 to 2024 Spending rose from 1.45 billion dollars in 1998 to 4.44 billion dollars in 2024, in nominal dollars. $5B $4B $3B $2B $1B $0 $1.45B $4.44B 1998 2010 2024
Reporting under the Lobbying Disclosure Act started in 1998, so the series cannot begin earlier. The nominal total rose approximately three times. These are nominal dollars. Prices approximately doubled over the same period, so in constant dollars the rise is approximately 1.6 times. Source: OpenSecrets, compiled from Senate Office of Public Records filings. The inflation comparison uses the CPI-U annual average, 163.0 in 1998 and 313.7 in 2024.
  • 1971Powell writes the memo. In Washington, 175 firms have registered lobbyists.
  • 1972The chief executives of major corporations form the Business Roundtable. Anderson publishes the memo.
  • 1973The Heritage Foundation starts. The American Legislative Exchange Council starts.
  • 1974–1977The Cato Institute and the Manhattan Institute start. The American Enterprise Institute grows quickly.
  • 1978Powell writes the majority opinion in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti. The Court decides that a state must not stop corporate spending on referendum campaigns. The value of speech, Powell writes, does not depend on the identity of the speaker.
  • 1982In Washington, nearly 2,500 firms have registered lobbyists. The number was 175 in 1971.
  • 2001The memo appears again on the internet and circulates widely. It then gets its present reputation as a founding document.
  • 2010Citizens United v. FEC gives corporations the right to spend on candidate elections. Bellotti is part of the line of precedent for this decision.
The dispute Writers on the left and on the right both dispute that the memo caused these changes.

Many writers describe the memo as the plan that created the modern conservative institutions. Other writers dispute this description. The dispute is not a party-political one. Writers on the left and on the right make the same objection.

Against

The memo got little attention when Powell sent it. There is little evidence that the people who built the new institutions read it. The new organizations did not follow Powell's plan. Powell put the Chamber and the existing business bodies at the center, and not new institutes.

Powell himself was a corporate moderate. He named collective bargaining as one part of the free enterprise system. The historian Mark Schmitt writes that the memo returned to public view in approximately 2001, and that writers then made it into an origin story. To call it a blueprint, he writes, is a fiction. Conservative writers make the same objection for a different reason. The people who built these institutions already held these opinions, and did not need the memo.

For

Powell described the change before it happened, and he described it in detail. Business did almost all of his recommendations in fifteen years. It used the courts, monitored the media, funded the campuses, spent steadily on politics, and organized at a national level.

The value of the memo is therefore not that it started the change. Its value is that one short document states the plan clearly. Nobody else wrote the plan down.

The evidence most often cited

People who argue for the influence of the memo point to one chart above all. Pay and productivity rose together until the 1970s. They then separated, and the gap has grown since.

Productivity and typical worker pay

Index, 1948 = 100

Productivity and typical worker pay, index 1948 = 100 The two measures rise together to 1979. After 1979 productivity grows 93.2 percent and hourly pay grows 33.7 percent. 500 400 300 200 100 1979 Productivity Hourly pay +93.2% since 1979 +33.7% since 1979 1960 1980 2000 2020
Net productivity is output less depreciation, per hour worked, for the total economy. Pay is the compensation, wages and benefits, of production and nonsupervisory workers in the private sector. These workers are approximately 80 percent of the private workforce. The two lines are drawn from the average annual growth rates that EPI publishes for the two periods: 2.5 and 2.1 percent to 1979, then 1.4 and 0.6 percent after it. The real series moves up and down each year, and this drawing does not show that movement. The endpoints and the division at 1979 match the published figures. Source: EPI analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis data.

The chart shows that the two measures separated. It does not show why. Other causes are proposed for the same period: the end of the Bretton Woods system in 1971, the oil shock of 1973, the fall in union membership, foreign competition, and technology. Economists also dispute the size of the gap, because the two measures use different price adjustments. The chart is evidence in the argument. It is not a conclusion.

Sources The full text, and the argument on both sides.

The full text is short. The Washington and Lee University School of Law holds Powell's papers and publishes the text. Read the original. It is clear and specific.